I cannot for the life of me understand how Erskine College or any other College for that matter could every possible call their educational institution a Christian College and tolerate such behavior as putting on car washes in speedos, and actuation off dates.
I would like to know what the next stunt the Administration is going to permit the students to do at Erskine College in the Name of Jesus Christ.
I would like to meet the person that gave Erskine College the name Christian College.
I personally think that losing 14 freshman would get someone's attention.
Maybe with my help spreading the word about the professor and the S I. student playing house, at her house
What was the professor's name oh yes, I heard it was Rachael, and what about the rumor concerning the theft in the financial aid office? How many employees has Erskine had to fire in the last 3 years?
AH yes and lets not forget the infamous Tony Santella, Ladies man extraordinarine
Hire you a good Lawyer Tony, May is coming soon, I pay all of my Debts
Tony and the Grade Chaser's Don't push girls, their's enough A's for everyone.
like I always say, if you have a son or daughter that likes the anything goes college life and loves to date professors, drink when they are underage learn the art of gambling and
just think, They can do all of the above under the guise of Christianity.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Christian College, WHAT?
Hey Everyone, THe annual SCA/ODK auction will be held next Thursday, March 6th at11:00 am during convo. We will be auctioning off fun things likerounds of golf, trips to the tanning bed, intellectual dinners withyour favorite teachers, boy and girl dates, speedo car washes...andMUCH MUCH MORE!!! ;) So don't forget to come and bring your moneybecause we WILL hunt you down until you pay us!!! Besides what couldbe better than a little fun and some convo credit all at the sametime? The money from the auction will actually be going to the JanetAlexander Memorial Scholarship for students, the betterment of ODK andSCA in numerous ways so that we can give back to you the Erskinecommunity, and hopefully to the students themselves via activites,funds, and services. Every year we have topped the year before so Iwant all of you to be there to make this the best one yet!! We areexcited to have our own beloved Jason Nussbaum as our auctioneer soget ready to spend some MOOLAH!! Hope everyone has a good rest of theweek and see you next Thursday!Sincerely,AShlee LaFontaine (ODK President)Philip Bunch (SCA President)
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Part 1
Part one.
HARD LESSONS is a collection of essays about crime control by Richard Hil and Gordon Tait.
While the lessons most directly apply to New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, the cycle of dysfunction described parallels that seen in the U.S. The book is divided into case studies which illustrate the failure of governments to devise policies that are effective in controlling crime. The authors argue that being tough on crime is a sure vote getter for politicians, but that in general it seems that policy makers do not foresee or plan for negative side effects of their policies.
Chapter One, written by editor Gordon Tait, argues that government “hurtles from crisis to crisis, from failure to failure, and it is the regulation of that failure which produces new initiatives and new forms of governance” (p.9).
This accurately describes government handling of school violence in the U.S.. Faced with the trend of violence in school, a logical response would be to find out how it happened that school became such a place as to compel students to risk arrest, injury or death, and then remove the reasons for violence.
Instead, U.S. legislators, (like those in N.Z., Australia and the U.K.), chose the simpler alternative of harsher penalties for violence.
In doing so, they copied previous failures of the same type: zero tolerance policing is based on ideas published in a seminal article entitled “Broken Windows” in the Atlantic Monthly magazine (George Kelling and James Q. Wilson 1982). Implications of the broken windows theory included that strict enforcement of petty crime would prevent the development of an atmosphere conducive to more serious criminal offending.
Kelling & Wilson’s model didn’t concern itself overmuch with why these crimes occured - it focused on suppression.
This approach had been discredited long before: “... consistent findings of operant psychology that the application of punishment is unpredictable, and unlikely to lead to the learning of new behavior.”
Skinner, B. F. 1953. Science and human behavior.
Skinner’s research in turn recapitulated still earlier experience during the Prohibition Era, when it became abundantly clear that raising penalties for manufacture, sales and use of alcohol had no effect on any of those enterprises.
In the next essay of Hard Lessons, author Murray Lee asserts that officials cultivate public fear of crime in order to demand more power with which to suppress that crime.
This, too finds it’s parallel in U.S. policy: the failing “War On Drugs”, which is modeled on the failed Prohibition, which is modeled on a previous failure of drug-control which began back when Sears, Roebuck & Company still sold cocaine syrup in quart bottles advertised in their catalogue. In all these cases, politicians played on public fears in order to assume expanded powers-of-office claimed necessary to ‘eradicate the problem once and for all.’
Zero‑tolerance first received national attention as the title of a program developed in 1986 by US Attorney Peter Noone in San Diego, California impounding seagoing vessels carrying any amount of drugs. The impracticality of this should be obvious: merchants could - and did - eliminate rivals by planting drugs for law-enforcement officials to ‘find’, bribing same to turn a blind eye to their own traffic, or both.
Innocents could easily be penalized with the guilty, as well: By 1990 the customs service boat impoundment program was quietly phased out after a Woods Hole oceanographic Institute research vessel was siezed for a marijuana cigarette foundin a seaman's cabin.
That is, by 1990 the folk who originated Zero Tolerance already knew it didn’t work, and abandoned it; meanwhile, the simplistic allure of the slogan was beginning to catch on with the general public.
If the politicians who cheered Zero Tolerance in 1986 didn’t know it was a failure by 1990, they should have. This begs the (rhetorical) questions: If our political leaders did not know ZT was useless - why not? ... and if they did know ZT was useless - why would they continue to push it?
Author Murray Lee’s essay continues on the subject of politician’s cultivation of public fear: ‘this often increases the fear of crime rather than providing a mechanism to ease societal anxiety.’ This too has it’s parallel in the history of Zero Tolerance.
In a sense, politicians are part of the Entertainment Industry; they sell their bit of drama to the public at a price like other actors. They have a natural conjunction of interest with news-media: profit.
Mass-media sell air-time to advertisers for money; politicians sell rhetoric to voters for power rather than cash, but the mechanism by which both operate is the same: getting and holding public attention.
Fear draws more attention than fun-stuff; logic tells us that we can indulge our interests, or let them slide; survival-instinct tells us that we must pay attention to that which can do harm.
The history of Zero Tolerance offers many examples, of which the following is representative: Court TV Radio - 04 Oct., 2006 University of Virginia psychologist Dewey Cornell looks at school shootings:
Julie: “Professor Cornell, ... It seems to me that the media would report
that school homicides and violence in general has been declining for ten years ....”
Dewey Cornell: “Violence and fear is more interesting than facts.”
Court TV Host: “... I think our societal perceptions are that school violence is NOT rare ‑ are we wrong on that?”
Cornell: “ ... We DO have a lot of bullying at school....” We do need to talk with students about violence, but not necessarily the extreme kinds we hear about in the news....Students will encounter fights, bullying, teasing, drugs, etc. in school. We need to focus our time and energy and school security dollars on the problems that we face every day....”
NicNYC: “What school‑based prevention methods are effective?”
Cornell: “... The most effective programs include counseling, cognitive behavior therapy,
conflict resolution, training, social skills training. ... One student alone cannot do much, but the whole school should address the problem. Teachers and parents and students need to be educated about bullying.”
Note: In this 2006 interview, Cornell echoes Skiba & Peterson six years previous in Zero Tolerance, Zero Evidence (2000): ... “Professional opinion has begun to coalesce around ...:creating a more positive school climate, attending to early warning signs, and effectively responding to disruption and violence with a broad array of strategies.”
(APA, 1993; Walker et al., 1996) Dwyer et al., 1998; Skiba & Peterson, 2000; Note also significant differences between Zero Tolerance strategy and Early Response strategy: Zero Tolerance deals with a complex social problem using the blunt tactic of a blacksmith: hammer it flat.
It requires no thought, no personal involvement - perfect for an assembly-line worker in a factory. Early Response demands personal investment of time and effort to deal with problems before they become dangerous. Zero Tolerance requires that citizens give up certain civil rights so that politicians can solve problems without bothering citizens. Early Response entails that social problems can be solved without sacrificing individual rights.
Returning to Hard Lessons, Chris Cunneen’s piece, “The Political Resonance of Crime Control Strategies: ZeroTolerance Policing,” traces the history of zero tolerance policing in New York City and New South Wales (Australia).
The findings here follow a familiar pattern; zero tolerance policing has done little to reduce crime in the long run, has contributed to social conflict and excited concerns of racism, and it is heavy handed and confrontational by definition.
Policies regulating western democracies create a tragic patchwork of reform after reform, with little improvement.
That is, Zero Tolerance is not the problem; Zero Tolerance is one example of a much greater problem visible in all these nations: based on the hard lessons of history, politicians have neither the interest nor the competence to set the standards by which other human beings run theirlives.
Their function - on paper - is to express the will of those who elected them - no more, no less.
When they depart from that, they are automatically dangerous to the very principles they were elected to protect.
Humanity as a species has come a long way from beginning to present, but systems of government are essentially un-changed from those in use several hundred years B.C.E.
It seems reasonable that a species which is capable of creating ways to travel between planets is, by now, also capable of social engineering far more useful than what’s now in use.
The course of the Zero Tolerance issue provides examples of what’s gone wrong with the System, and suggests remedies.
HARD LESSONS is a collection of essays about crime control by Richard Hil and Gordon Tait.
While the lessons most directly apply to New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, the cycle of dysfunction described parallels that seen in the U.S. The book is divided into case studies which illustrate the failure of governments to devise policies that are effective in controlling crime. The authors argue that being tough on crime is a sure vote getter for politicians, but that in general it seems that policy makers do not foresee or plan for negative side effects of their policies.
Chapter One, written by editor Gordon Tait, argues that government “hurtles from crisis to crisis, from failure to failure, and it is the regulation of that failure which produces new initiatives and new forms of governance” (p.9).
This accurately describes government handling of school violence in the U.S.. Faced with the trend of violence in school, a logical response would be to find out how it happened that school became such a place as to compel students to risk arrest, injury or death, and then remove the reasons for violence.
Instead, U.S. legislators, (like those in N.Z., Australia and the U.K.), chose the simpler alternative of harsher penalties for violence.
In doing so, they copied previous failures of the same type: zero tolerance policing is based on ideas published in a seminal article entitled “Broken Windows” in the Atlantic Monthly magazine (George Kelling and James Q. Wilson 1982). Implications of the broken windows theory included that strict enforcement of petty crime would prevent the development of an atmosphere conducive to more serious criminal offending.
Kelling & Wilson’s model didn’t concern itself overmuch with why these crimes occured - it focused on suppression.
This approach had been discredited long before: “... consistent findings of operant psychology that the application of punishment is unpredictable, and unlikely to lead to the learning of new behavior.”
Skinner, B. F. 1953. Science and human behavior.
Skinner’s research in turn recapitulated still earlier experience during the Prohibition Era, when it became abundantly clear that raising penalties for manufacture, sales and use of alcohol had no effect on any of those enterprises.
In the next essay of Hard Lessons, author Murray Lee asserts that officials cultivate public fear of crime in order to demand more power with which to suppress that crime.
This, too finds it’s parallel in U.S. policy: the failing “War On Drugs”, which is modeled on the failed Prohibition, which is modeled on a previous failure of drug-control which began back when Sears, Roebuck & Company still sold cocaine syrup in quart bottles advertised in their catalogue. In all these cases, politicians played on public fears in order to assume expanded powers-of-office claimed necessary to ‘eradicate the problem once and for all.’
Zero‑tolerance first received national attention as the title of a program developed in 1986 by US Attorney Peter Noone in San Diego, California impounding seagoing vessels carrying any amount of drugs. The impracticality of this should be obvious: merchants could - and did - eliminate rivals by planting drugs for law-enforcement officials to ‘find’, bribing same to turn a blind eye to their own traffic, or both.
Innocents could easily be penalized with the guilty, as well: By 1990 the customs service boat impoundment program was quietly phased out after a Woods Hole oceanographic Institute research vessel was siezed for a marijuana cigarette foundin a seaman's cabin.
That is, by 1990 the folk who originated Zero Tolerance already knew it didn’t work, and abandoned it; meanwhile, the simplistic allure of the slogan was beginning to catch on with the general public.
If the politicians who cheered Zero Tolerance in 1986 didn’t know it was a failure by 1990, they should have. This begs the (rhetorical) questions: If our political leaders did not know ZT was useless - why not? ... and if they did know ZT was useless - why would they continue to push it?
Author Murray Lee’s essay continues on the subject of politician’s cultivation of public fear: ‘this often increases the fear of crime rather than providing a mechanism to ease societal anxiety.’ This too has it’s parallel in the history of Zero Tolerance.
In a sense, politicians are part of the Entertainment Industry; they sell their bit of drama to the public at a price like other actors. They have a natural conjunction of interest with news-media: profit.
Mass-media sell air-time to advertisers for money; politicians sell rhetoric to voters for power rather than cash, but the mechanism by which both operate is the same: getting and holding public attention.
Fear draws more attention than fun-stuff; logic tells us that we can indulge our interests, or let them slide; survival-instinct tells us that we must pay attention to that which can do harm.
The history of Zero Tolerance offers many examples, of which the following is representative: Court TV Radio - 04 Oct., 2006 University of Virginia psychologist Dewey Cornell looks at school shootings:
Julie: “Professor Cornell, ... It seems to me that the media would report
that school homicides and violence in general has been declining for ten years ....”
Dewey Cornell: “Violence and fear is more interesting than facts.”
Court TV Host: “... I think our societal perceptions are that school violence is NOT rare ‑ are we wrong on that?”
Cornell: “ ... We DO have a lot of bullying at school....” We do need to talk with students about violence, but not necessarily the extreme kinds we hear about in the news....Students will encounter fights, bullying, teasing, drugs, etc. in school. We need to focus our time and energy and school security dollars on the problems that we face every day....”
NicNYC: “What school‑based prevention methods are effective?”
Cornell: “... The most effective programs include counseling, cognitive behavior therapy,
conflict resolution, training, social skills training. ... One student alone cannot do much, but the whole school should address the problem. Teachers and parents and students need to be educated about bullying.”
Note: In this 2006 interview, Cornell echoes Skiba & Peterson six years previous in Zero Tolerance, Zero Evidence (2000): ... “Professional opinion has begun to coalesce around ...:creating a more positive school climate, attending to early warning signs, and effectively responding to disruption and violence with a broad array of strategies.”
(APA, 1993; Walker et al., 1996) Dwyer et al., 1998; Skiba & Peterson, 2000; Note also significant differences between Zero Tolerance strategy and Early Response strategy: Zero Tolerance deals with a complex social problem using the blunt tactic of a blacksmith: hammer it flat.
It requires no thought, no personal involvement - perfect for an assembly-line worker in a factory. Early Response demands personal investment of time and effort to deal with problems before they become dangerous. Zero Tolerance requires that citizens give up certain civil rights so that politicians can solve problems without bothering citizens. Early Response entails that social problems can be solved without sacrificing individual rights.
Returning to Hard Lessons, Chris Cunneen’s piece, “The Political Resonance of Crime Control Strategies: ZeroTolerance Policing,” traces the history of zero tolerance policing in New York City and New South Wales (Australia).
The findings here follow a familiar pattern; zero tolerance policing has done little to reduce crime in the long run, has contributed to social conflict and excited concerns of racism, and it is heavy handed and confrontational by definition.
Policies regulating western democracies create a tragic patchwork of reform after reform, with little improvement.
That is, Zero Tolerance is not the problem; Zero Tolerance is one example of a much greater problem visible in all these nations: based on the hard lessons of history, politicians have neither the interest nor the competence to set the standards by which other human beings run theirlives.
Their function - on paper - is to express the will of those who elected them - no more, no less.
When they depart from that, they are automatically dangerous to the very principles they were elected to protect.
Humanity as a species has come a long way from beginning to present, but systems of government are essentially un-changed from those in use several hundred years B.C.E.
It seems reasonable that a species which is capable of creating ways to travel between planets is, by now, also capable of social engineering far more useful than what’s now in use.
The course of the Zero Tolerance issue provides examples of what’s gone wrong with the System, and suggests remedies.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Erskine College
Erskine College
Mission Statement….. Christian Commitment and Excellence in Learning
Does anyone know what this means?
Nestled in the small town of Due West, SC, Erskine college at first glance gives one the thoughts of a quiet small college with all of the peacefulness and tranquility of a utopia.
You hear the conversations that whisper into one’s head as they walk along the paths that lead from building to building while listening to the spill that is memorized by the tour guide selling the prospective student and the parents on enrolling the student in Erskine College.
Well folks it works. Its not until later that you learn that behind those walls of the quant buildings are lurking two of the professors who are checking out all of the females that are going to enroll and before the female student even gets her feet on the ground (so to speak).
Tony Santella and Mickey Conway are devising ways to get the student off campus for a little R and R that has nothing to do with the subjects that are taught in the class rooms
They are like two copperheads lurking in the bushes waiting to strike.
Erskine is unlike the college’s sister college, Presbyterian College located in Clinton, SC.
Erskine students are allowed to drink at any age just as long as the administration doesn’t see it.
The experience I had with this so called Christian College is that I wanted my family member to go to a college where they had a Christian atmosphere along with the regular academic subjects and taught good Christian values.
The shock I was in for was beyond belief. First Tony Santella was advertised as the teacher of the year at Launder University and had come over to Erskine to teach.
Upon investigating Mr. Santella, I learned from Launder University that Mr. Santella was never, I repeat NEVER recognized for anything.
As time went on Mr. Santella started trying to get my family member off campus, first it was bowling and when she refused to take part in this Mr. Santell devised another scheme, he decided to have a contest between the students.
The contest was to split the class into two parts and he sent half of the class to one coffee shop in Abbeville and the other half of the class to another coffee shop in Abbeville.
The two coffee shops we to compete in order to see who could sell the most coffee.
This was supposed to be a lesson in Sales Management, as the class was titled.
The member of my family asked Mr. Santell what should she do to try to sell coffee, when Mr. Santella replied that she should stand on the corner and do whatever it takes to sell the coffee.
I ask you, what does this have to do with sales management?
When someone comes into a Duncan Donut shop does anyone really have to persuade them to buy coffee?
When my family member refused to take part in this craziness she had to write a paper.
When she received her final grade she received an A in the class. This is academic fraud because she learned absolutely nothing about Sales Management at a very high cost.
She received an A and should have received an F and the teacher should have been fired.
Is this the kind of College you want your Daughter to attend?
My family member attended Summer College at Erskine, where she had an adjunct professor named Mickey Conway from Clemson University. Mr. Conway taught at Erskine in the summer.
Mr. Conway immediately started trying to date my family member.
She got to the point of being scared to go to Erskine and I was beginning to be afraid for her, so I took the appropriate steps, I notified Dr. Ruble, the president of Erskine, and I informed him of what was taking place, he did nothing.
I then notified Dr. Don Weatherman the Dean of Academics at Erskine and relayed the same information, he did nothing. I finally called Guy Smith the Chairman of the board of trustees and he did nothing.
I was in shock; the complete ignoring of the situation by the very people that are supposed to protect the students was condoning this kind of conduct from two of their professors.
She wanted to quit going to Erskine College out of fear for her safety.
I made a call to Clemson and informed them of what was taking place and they gave it their undivided attention. But if it hadn’t been for the Chief of Police whom I called when I was at my wits end and she was on the verge of dropping out of college that this good man and police officer gave us his reassurance that she would be safe along with any one else that came into the town of Due West.
This caring man is Chief James Smith, whom we will always be grateful to.
Mickey Conway was supposed to teach every day and he never taught on Fridays, not a single Friday and he was absent the entire last week of school, yet the students were charged the full price as though he were in the class room teaching even though he was absent for more than 20% of the class meetings.
Well, so much for excellence in education.
Now lets look at Christian commitment.
In the 2007 year book one of the Christian students was sitting in another students lap and he was holding a gun and she was covered by nothing more than 3 handkerchiefs
The caption read “Bond Girl”. I ask you what Christian Administration would allow this in a year book much less condone it?
Along with the almost NAKED student through the pages of the year book you will see men dressed as women and students holding wine bottles.
I ask you just who were they praying to, certainly not Jesus Christ, and certainly not the Christ I preached about for 32 years.
Well, so much for the mission statement of Erskine College.
Is this the College of your choice to send you sons and daughters?
It is my opinion that Erskine Colleges is allowing the students to break local and state laws by allowing underage students to drink alcohol and to advertise for poker players on the Erskine web site and to Vandalize local businesses by removing their benches they have for people to sit on outside the stores.
Mission Statement….. Christian Commitment and Excellence in Learning
Does anyone know what this means?
Nestled in the small town of Due West, SC, Erskine college at first glance gives one the thoughts of a quiet small college with all of the peacefulness and tranquility of a utopia.
You hear the conversations that whisper into one’s head as they walk along the paths that lead from building to building while listening to the spill that is memorized by the tour guide selling the prospective student and the parents on enrolling the student in Erskine College.
Well folks it works. Its not until later that you learn that behind those walls of the quant buildings are lurking two of the professors who are checking out all of the females that are going to enroll and before the female student even gets her feet on the ground (so to speak).
Tony Santella and Mickey Conway are devising ways to get the student off campus for a little R and R that has nothing to do with the subjects that are taught in the class rooms
They are like two copperheads lurking in the bushes waiting to strike.
Erskine is unlike the college’s sister college, Presbyterian College located in Clinton, SC.
Erskine students are allowed to drink at any age just as long as the administration doesn’t see it.
The experience I had with this so called Christian College is that I wanted my family member to go to a college where they had a Christian atmosphere along with the regular academic subjects and taught good Christian values.
The shock I was in for was beyond belief. First Tony Santella was advertised as the teacher of the year at Launder University and had come over to Erskine to teach.
Upon investigating Mr. Santella, I learned from Launder University that Mr. Santella was never, I repeat NEVER recognized for anything.
As time went on Mr. Santella started trying to get my family member off campus, first it was bowling and when she refused to take part in this Mr. Santell devised another scheme, he decided to have a contest between the students.
The contest was to split the class into two parts and he sent half of the class to one coffee shop in Abbeville and the other half of the class to another coffee shop in Abbeville.
The two coffee shops we to compete in order to see who could sell the most coffee.
This was supposed to be a lesson in Sales Management, as the class was titled.
The member of my family asked Mr. Santell what should she do to try to sell coffee, when Mr. Santella replied that she should stand on the corner and do whatever it takes to sell the coffee.
I ask you, what does this have to do with sales management?
When someone comes into a Duncan Donut shop does anyone really have to persuade them to buy coffee?
When my family member refused to take part in this craziness she had to write a paper.
When she received her final grade she received an A in the class. This is academic fraud because she learned absolutely nothing about Sales Management at a very high cost.
She received an A and should have received an F and the teacher should have been fired.
Is this the kind of College you want your Daughter to attend?
My family member attended Summer College at Erskine, where she had an adjunct professor named Mickey Conway from Clemson University. Mr. Conway taught at Erskine in the summer.
Mr. Conway immediately started trying to date my family member.
She got to the point of being scared to go to Erskine and I was beginning to be afraid for her, so I took the appropriate steps, I notified Dr. Ruble, the president of Erskine, and I informed him of what was taking place, he did nothing.
I then notified Dr. Don Weatherman the Dean of Academics at Erskine and relayed the same information, he did nothing. I finally called Guy Smith the Chairman of the board of trustees and he did nothing.
I was in shock; the complete ignoring of the situation by the very people that are supposed to protect the students was condoning this kind of conduct from two of their professors.
She wanted to quit going to Erskine College out of fear for her safety.
I made a call to Clemson and informed them of what was taking place and they gave it their undivided attention. But if it hadn’t been for the Chief of Police whom I called when I was at my wits end and she was on the verge of dropping out of college that this good man and police officer gave us his reassurance that she would be safe along with any one else that came into the town of Due West.
This caring man is Chief James Smith, whom we will always be grateful to.
Mickey Conway was supposed to teach every day and he never taught on Fridays, not a single Friday and he was absent the entire last week of school, yet the students were charged the full price as though he were in the class room teaching even though he was absent for more than 20% of the class meetings.
Well, so much for excellence in education.
Now lets look at Christian commitment.
In the 2007 year book one of the Christian students was sitting in another students lap and he was holding a gun and she was covered by nothing more than 3 handkerchiefs
The caption read “Bond Girl”. I ask you what Christian Administration would allow this in a year book much less condone it?
Along with the almost NAKED student through the pages of the year book you will see men dressed as women and students holding wine bottles.
I ask you just who were they praying to, certainly not Jesus Christ, and certainly not the Christ I preached about for 32 years.
Well, so much for the mission statement of Erskine College.
Is this the College of your choice to send you sons and daughters?
It is my opinion that Erskine Colleges is allowing the students to break local and state laws by allowing underage students to drink alcohol and to advertise for poker players on the Erskine web site and to Vandalize local businesses by removing their benches they have for people to sit on outside the stores.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)